Court Documents

Appeal to the 9th Circuit Court:

Final Judgement:

Response to Government’s Memorandum….

Link to the Defense Resentencing Memorandum…

Link to the Prosecution Resentencing Memorandum…


Cox_SupremeCourt_ReplyBrief_051818 Cox_SupremeCourt_USBrief_050918


4 Informants

“If you know anyone of influence in government who could help right this wrong, will you please use your contacts to reach out to them?”

Cert Petition E-FILED

President Trump Letter


66 Page Timeline

Rule 60B

Trump for Pastors

Larry Pratt To Trump

Timeline of Events

Schuelke Report

Napue Violation

Gov Kidnapping

Cox Appeal memorandum Rehearing Extension

Gov Kidnapping

Rehearing Extension

Bambi Tyree Article

Appeal Brief filed in order to get Schaeffer a rehearing with the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals:

Schaeffer’s Extension Reply:


Government answer to Schaeffer’s Appeal:





Third Superseding Indictment

“There is reason to believe that the grand jury never voted to indict Schaeffer on his Third Superseding Indictment. This is the indictment that his trial and sentence are based on. Federal Rule 6 requires that the indictment be brought before a magistrate judge in open court and records kept. Schaeffer filed a FOIA on 10/27/2014 asking for documentation to establish conformity with Rule 6. The FOIA returned that “no responsive records” could be found. If the US is unable to prove that proper indictment procedures were followed then Schaeffer’s case would be dismissed.”