Court Documents
Appeal to the 9th Circuit Court: https://documentcloud.adobe.com/link/track?uri=urn%3Aaaid%3Ascds%3AUS%3Ab1bc05e2-1717-4ebc-9704-0da13901ef15
Final Judgement: https://documentcloud.adobe.com/link/track?uri=urn%3Aaaid%3Ascds%3AUS%3Ab928f80f-65cc-4167-b8a6-c50ba6d24982
Response to Government’s Memorandum….
Link to the Defense Resentencing Memorandum…
Link to the Prosecution Resentencing Memorandum…
Cox_SupremeCourt_ReplyBrief_051818 Cox_SupremeCourt_USBrief_050918
Cox_SupremeCourt_ReplyBrief_051818
https://yearofjubile.com/cox-%231
Cox_SupremeCourt_USBrief_05091866
Cox Appeal memorandum Rehearing Extension
Appeal Brief filed in order to get Schaeffer a rehearing with the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/i9dj9r6o72ewwn1/13-30000_Documents.pdf?dl=0
Schaeffer’s Extension Reply:
Government answer to Schaeffer’s Appeal:
Cox_USansweringbriefCorrected_022717
Sentencing:
Cox_sentencingstatement_010813
Third Superseding Indictment
“There is reason to believe that the grand jury never voted to indict Schaeffer on his Third Superseding Indictment. This is the indictment that his trial and sentence are based on. Federal Rule 6 requires that the indictment be brought before a magistrate judge in open court and records kept. Schaeffer filed a FOIA on 10/27/2014 asking for documentation to establish conformity with Rule 6. The FOIA returned that “no responsive records” could be found. If the US is unable to prove that proper indictment procedures were followed then Schaeffer’s case would be dismissed.”